• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

John Stossel on Eminent Domain Run Amok

ByCHRIS KILMER and CHRISTINA CARON
March 03, 2009, 2:38 PM

March 3, 2009— -- Susette Kelo, now 52 years old, had hoped to stay in her little pink house forever. She bought her New London, Conn., home in 1997 and fell in love with the neighborhood.

Then she learned that the government can just take your property, if doing so will improve the common good of the community. City officials said Kelo would be "fairly compensated" but said she didn't have a choice about whether or not she would sell. Some people would call this stealing, but it's not. It's called "eminent domain," a legal term that means "supreme lordship."

Traditionally, governments use eminent domain to clear space for highways or railroads. In New London, town officials wanted the space for private developers. Chris Riley, who in 2001 represented the New London Development Corp., said that construction would bring in more than 5,000 jobs and $12.5 million in new local taxes. The city hired lawyer Wesley Horton to defend the redevelopment plan.

But despite the city's legal efforts, Kelo refused to move.

"I liked it there," she said. "It was all just bull----, from the beginning."

The city put a notice on Kelo's door, explaining that the house was condemned. Her neighbors received notices, too.

"We were backed into corners, like animals," she said.

But even when the bulldozers came, Kelo and six of her neighbors refused to leave. They protested, got lawyers involved and eventually managed to get their case heard by the Supreme Court, in February 2005. Months later, her attorney Dana Berliner found out that they had lost -- by one vote.

"I think that was when I started screaming," Berliner said. "The Kelo decision opened the door for eminent domain abuse all across the country."

New London is just one of many places that government has taken land for purposes that critics say are outside the traditional use of eminent domain. In Brooklyn, N.Y., developers are attempting to use eminent domain to take apartments and businesses to build a big sports complex.

The city of Hurst, Texas, agreed to condemn more than 100 houses in order to make way for a shopping mall. The town of Piscataway, N.J., took away a family-owned farm because the city said it wanted to preserve open spaces.

Up Next in News—

12-year-old boy speaks out after surviving shark bite in the Bahamas

June 29, 2026

Texas education board votes to make Bible passages required reading

June 26, 2026

Microsoft joins Apple in raising prices as fans await new 'Grand Theft Auto' game

June 25, 2026

Prosecutors drop rape charge against Harvey Weinstein, avoiding 4th trial

June 25, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News