• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Contact Us
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Oregon's Right-to-Die Law Upheld by Supreme Court

ByMANNY MEDRANO
January 17, 2006, 8:26 PM

Jan. 17, 2006 — -- In a stinging rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court sided with Oregon in upholding the nation's only physician-assisted suicide law.

Oregon voters have twice upheld a law that permits the terminally ill to take an overdose of drugs if two doctors agree with the diagnosis and conclude the patient is of sound mind. To date, more than 200 terminally ill patients in Oregon have used the law, and now millions may be affected by the Supreme Court's decision.

Some patients, such as Lovelle Svart, who has terminal lung cancer, applauded the decision. Svart said she was "speechless and excited" about today's ruling.

Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy rebuffed efforts by the nation's top law enforcement official, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, to criminally charge doctors who helped people end their lives. According to Gonzales, federal drug laws did not permit or condone doctor-assisted suicide.

Justice Kennedy disagreed, holding that the federal government did not have the authority to prosecute physicians. The majority vote also included Justices John Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Opponents of Oregon's law had argued that doctors are in the business of preserving life, not terminating it. That resonated with Justice Antonin Scalia, who in a strongly worded dissent said the federal government had the power to intervene, and most assuredly could prevent "the prescription of drugs to produce death."

Justice Scalia was joined in his dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice John Roberts. Roberts' vote came as a surprise in the first controversial case of this term. A strong proponent of states' rights, Chief Justice Roberts was expected to support Oregon's right-to-die law but instead backed the administration's efforts to prosecute physicians.

This is an issue that has personally affected members of the Supreme Court. Justices Stevens and Ginsburg have both fought and beaten cancer. Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist succumbed to thyroid cancer only months ago.

After the high court's decision, other states are now expected to follow Oregon's statutory model and pass their own physician-assisted suicide laws.

Up Next in News—

What to know about new Apple HomeView smart home display hub

November 12, 2026

Pilot father of 20-year-old co-pilot in Learjet crash says he's still searching for answers

November 12, 2026

Americans' credit card debt reaches nearly $1.3 trillion

November 11, 2026

Daredevil couple who scaled Empire State Building speak out, say they're 'ready to take responsibility'

November 11, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Your Privacy Choices— 
  • Contact Us— 
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts— 

© 2026 ABC News