• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Oregon's Right-to-Die Law Upheld by Supreme Court

ByMANNY MEDRANO
January 17, 2006, 8:26 PM

Jan. 17, 2006 — -- In a stinging rebuke to the Bush administration, the Supreme Court sided with Oregon in upholding the nation's only physician-assisted suicide law.

Oregon voters have twice upheld a law that permits the terminally ill to take an overdose of drugs if two doctors agree with the diagnosis and conclude the patient is of sound mind. To date, more than 200 terminally ill patients in Oregon have used the law, and now millions may be affected by the Supreme Court's decision.

Some patients, such as Lovelle Svart, who has terminal lung cancer, applauded the decision. Svart said she was "speechless and excited" about today's ruling.

Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy rebuffed efforts by the nation's top law enforcement official, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, to criminally charge doctors who helped people end their lives. According to Gonzales, federal drug laws did not permit or condone doctor-assisted suicide.

Justice Kennedy disagreed, holding that the federal government did not have the authority to prosecute physicians. The majority vote also included Justices John Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Opponents of Oregon's law had argued that doctors are in the business of preserving life, not terminating it. That resonated with Justice Antonin Scalia, who in a strongly worded dissent said the federal government had the power to intervene, and most assuredly could prevent "the prescription of drugs to produce death."

Justice Scalia was joined in his dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice John Roberts. Roberts' vote came as a surprise in the first controversial case of this term. A strong proponent of states' rights, Chief Justice Roberts was expected to support Oregon's right-to-die law but instead backed the administration's efforts to prosecute physicians.

This is an issue that has personally affected members of the Supreme Court. Justices Stevens and Ginsburg have both fought and beaten cancer. Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist succumbed to thyroid cancer only months ago.

After the high court's decision, other states are now expected to follow Oregon's statutory model and pass their own physician-assisted suicide laws.

Up Next in News—

This San Francisco shop is run completely by an AI agent

April 23, 2026

Mother charged after teen son allegedly hits and injures 81-year-old veteran while riding e-motorcycle

April 23, 2026

UK bill banning smoking products for those born after 2008 is one step away from becoming law

April 22, 2026

Pilot killed in Florida plane crash hailed as hero

April 21, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News