• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Evidence allegedly destroyed by officers at police precinct during George Floyd protest threatens to derail drug case

0:48
Man sentenced to 4 years for helping set Minneapolis police precinct on fire
Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images, FILE
ByBill Hutchinson
August 26, 2021, 9:09 PM

A Minnesota judge is considering whether to drop charges against an alleged drug dealer after his lawyer claimed Minneapolis law enforcement officers destroyed critical evidence in a panic prompted by a blaze and takeover of another police department precinct during a 2020 protest over the murder of George Floyd.

An attorney for 36-year-old Walter Power argued during a court hearing on Wednesday that Minneapolis police officers destroyed a search warrant obtained on Power's home that prosecutors said resulted in the seizure of 3,000 doses of the painkiller oxycodone and other illegal drugs.

Power has pleaded not guilty to a charge of felony first-degree sale of drugs.

"Those officers made that decision. I think what's difficult with this case is we all have to live with that decision," Power's attorney, public defender Elizabeth Karp, said during Wednesday's hearing on her motion to dismiss the case, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

PHOTO: In this May 28, 2020, file photo, flames from a nearby fire illuminate protesters standing on a  barricade in front of the Third Police Precinct in Minneapolis.
In this May 28, 2020, file photo, flames from a nearby fire illuminate protesters standing on a barricade in front of the Third Police Precinct in Minneapolis.
Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images, FILE

Karp said the lost search warrant presumably contained the evidence narcotics officers used to obtain the warrant to search Power's home in April 2020.

Karp argued that moving forward with the case would violate Power's constitutional right to due process under the law if she does not have the ability to review and challenge a court document that no longer exists, even in digital form.

"We're in the dark," Karp told Judge Todd Fellman of the Hennepin County Fourth Judicial District.

In this May 28, 2020, file photo, protesters use a barricade to try and break the windows of the Third Police Precinct in Minneapolis during a protest over the death of George Floyd.
Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images, FILE

On May 28, the Third Precinct in southeast Minneapolis was torched during a protest over the police killing of Floyd, forcing officers to abandon the station.

Related Articles

MORE: Man receives 4-year prison sentence, must pay $12 million in restitution for Minneapolis police precinct fire

In a motion filed in June, Karp included a supplemental report written by Minneapolis Police officer Logan Johansson stating why he and other investigators in the Second Precinct across the Mississippi River from the Third Precinct in northeast Minneapolis destroyed records. Johansson, according to his report, wrote that he and other officers suspected the station was going to be attacked too and decided to destroy or move documents "in direct response to the abandonment of the Third Police Precinct in Minneapolis by city leadership."

Johansson's report did not mention destroying the search warrant. The officer's report, according to court records reviewed by ABC News, says that "all non-active case files and files containing CI (confidential informant) information (were) destroyed."

Related Articles

MORE: Derek Chauvin found guilty on all counts in death of George Floyd

Protesters, however, never went to the Second Precinct, which is about five miles from the Third Precinct.

Protesters stand outside the Third Precinct police station on May 28, 2020, in Minneapolis.
Pioneer Press/MediaNews Group via Getty Images

Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Emily Liebman asked Fellman to reject Karp's motion and allow prosecutors to proceed with the case against Power, arguing in court that the missing documents are immaterial to the charges.

Related Articles

MORE: 1 dead, 1 injured after car plows into protesters in Minneapolis, police say

Liebman said none of the evidence collected from Power's home was destroyed and that prosecutors plan to use it at trial. She said investigators also conducted surveillance on Power and discovered evidence in the suspect's trash that supported the cause for the search of his home.

In her motion, Karp stated that GPS information investigators obtained by tracking Power's cellphone has also been lost.

Fellman said he will take the motion under advisement and render a decision soon.

Up Next in News—

This San Francisco shop is run completely by an AI agent

April 23, 2026

Mother charged after teen son allegedly hits and injures 81-year-old veteran while riding e-motorcycle

April 23, 2026

UK bill banning smoking products for those born after 2008 is one step away from becoming law

April 22, 2026

Pilot killed in Florida plane crash hailed as hero

April 21, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News