• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Contact Us
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Ex-immigration judge sues Trump administration, alleging she was fired over whistleblowing

0:28
ICE plans to purchase robot dogs
Ryan Murphy/AP Photo, FILE
ByLaura Romero
September 10, 2026, 9:28 PM

A former immigration judge in California has sued the Trump administration, alleging she was terminated without cause after raising concerns that federal agents had unlawfully detained an unaccompanied minor.

Chloe Dillon, who served as an immigration judge in San Francisco for three years, said in her complaint that she was terminated last August despite receiving "excellent reviews" and resolving thousands of cases with few appeals.

Dillon, who believes she was terminated in retaliation for whistleblowing, is one of more than 120 immigration judges who have been removed during the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to the union representing immigration judges.

Related Articles

ICE whistleblower alleged agency was shortcutting vetting process for new hires

According to Dillon's complaint, immigration judges received a directive last April from the assistant chief immigration judge stating that all requests by the Department of Homeland Security to move a case to a different venue should be granted.

The directive was contrary to previous court rulings that provided immigration judges with discretion to decide motions to change venue, Dillon's attorneys said in the complaint.

The former immigration judge expressed concern about the directive and met with Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Loi McCleskey, according to court documents.

"Plaintiff further expressed concern that it might interfere even with the non-citizen's right to counsel, as Plaintiff did not know if attorneys would be able to retain the case once transferred to another court, potentially even out of state," the complaint alleges.

In this Feb. 5, 2026, file photo, Federal agents walk down a street while conducting immigration enforcement operations in Minneapolis.
Ryan Murphy/AP Photo, FILE

"ACIJ McCleskey expressed empathy with Plaintiff's point of view but warned her that 'the White House' was paying attention to this and to be careful about pushing the issue further," Dillon's complaint states.

According to the complaint, Dillon raised concerns about ICE stating in motions that the immigration court was required to re-calendar asylum cases that had been closed, in order to allow ICE to pursue the removal of the asylum applicant.

In July and August 2025, Dillon issued two orders denying ICE's motion to re-calendar a case because the individuals were unaccompanied minors whose cases had been administratively closed.

The former judge alleged in the complaint that in late August an individual who had been arrested by ICE appeared in immigration court and represented himself because he did not have an attorney.

Dillon said she learned through court staff that the individual was detained after he left the courtroom and that there were "loud protests outside the court at 100 Montgomery that day, which made it nearly impossible to work in her chambers."

According to the complaint, Dillon looked at the individual's file again and noticed that he was "almost certainly a designated unaccompanied minor who could not be placed into expedited removal proceedings" and had a right to have his asylum case decided by an asylum officer.

"That same afternoon, Plaintiff sent an email to ACIJ McCleskey explaining these concerns and explicitly stating that she was concerned about potential violations of statutory law and due process," the complaint states.

Related Articles

'Terrified': Belarus asylum-seeker's partner fears for her life after months in ICE detention

Dillon was fired 48 hours after she sent the email, her attorneys said in the complaint.

"Plaintiff reported suspected violations of law, rule, or regulation to her supervisor, a person in a position of authority," the complaint states. "Two days later, she received an emailed letter from the Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, informing her that the Attorney General was terminating her employment 'pursuant to Article II of the Constitution.'"

In a statement to ABC News, a spokesperson for the Justice Department said, "While we do not typically comment on pending litigation or personnel matters, we can tell you that this allegation is patently false."

"After four years of the Biden Administration forcing Immigration Courts to implement a de facto amnesty for hundreds of thousands of aliens, this Department of Justice is restoring integrity to our immigration system and encourages talented legal professionals to join in our mission to protect national security and public safety," the spokesperson said.

Up Next in News—

Toys R Us planning major comeback ahead of holiday season

September 18, 2026

How to save at the pump amid high gas prices

September 18, 2026

Holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy trial says he 'didn't have any doubts' during deliberations

September 18, 2026

Uber ordered to pay $40M to parents of woman fatally struck after being left on freeway

September 17, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Your Privacy Choices— 
  • Contact Us— 
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts— 

© 2026 ABC News