• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Judge blocks Trump's asylum ban at southern border

3:35
How could Trump’s sweeping travel ban impact asylum seekers?
John Moore/Getty Images
ByLaura Romero
July 02, 2025, 9:02 PM

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration policy that restricts migrants who cross the southern border from seeking asylum.

In a 128-page order, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss wrote that President Donald Trump cannot "adopt an alternative immigration system," saying that Trump has exceeded his legal authority as president.

In an executive order issued in January, Trump declared that the situation at the southern border constitutes "an invasion of America" and suspended the ability of migrants to seek asylum.

Related Articles

MORE: DOJ looking at denaturalization for American citizens convicted of certain crimes

The Supreme Court, in a ruling last week, limited judges' power to block the president's executive orders on nationwide basis. But in his order Wednesday, Judge Moss concluded that "this is one of the rare cases in which injunctive relief is required."

Judge Moss said he recognizes that while the executive branch "faces enormous challenges in preventing and deterring unlawful entry" into the U.S., neither the Constitution nor the Immigration and Nationality Act "provides the President with the unilateral authority to limit the rights of aliens present in the United States to apply for asylum."

Migrants prepare to be transported by Border Patrol agents after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, Jan. 20, 2025 near Sasabe, Ariz.
John Moore/Getty Images

The federal judge granted the plaintiffs' request to certify a class of all people covered by Trump's executive order, and stayed his decision for 14 days to allow the Trump administration to appeal and to "prepare to implement the Court's order."

In response to the ruling, Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the ACLU, told ABC News that the "decision's importance cannot be overstated."

"The ruling is critical for those fleeing gruesome danger and reaffirms that the president in our system of government cannot simply give the back of his hand to laws passed by Congress," Gelernt said.

Up Next in News—

This San Francisco shop is run completely by an AI agent

April 23, 2026

Mother charged after teen son allegedly hits and injures 81-year-old veteran while riding e-motorcycle

April 23, 2026

UK bill banning smoking products for those born after 2008 is one step away from becoming law

April 22, 2026

Pilot killed in Florida plane crash hailed as hero

April 21, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News