• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Contact Us
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Judge in Trump's upcoming hush money trial to limit disclosure of jurors' identities

1:56
Manhattan DA seeks gag order on Trump before trial
Jay Paul/Reuters
ByAaron Katersky
March 07, 2024, 10:09 PM

The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's upcoming hush money trial in New York agreed on Thursday to limit the disclosure of the names and other identifying information of jurors, finding "there is a likelihood of bribery, jury tampering, or of physical injury or harassment of juror(s)."

Judge Juan Merchan's order did not include a ruling on the Manhattan district attorney's request for a limited gag order on the former president.

Related Articles

MORE: Infamous 'Access Hollywood' tape was 'catalyst' for Stormy Daniels hush payment, prosecutors say

Trump last April pleaded not guilty to a 34-count indictment charging him with falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment his then-attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels just days before the 2016 presidential election.

Jury selection for the trial is scheduled to get underway March 25 in New York City.

Judge Merchan agreed with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's request, made last month, to prohibit the disclosure of juror names other than to the parties and to counsel, their staff and consultants.

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures on stage during a campaign rally in Richmond, Virginia, Mar. 2, 2024.
Jay Paul/Reuters

He also limited disclosure of the business or residential address of any prospective or sworn juror to the counsel of record for either party.

Merchan said he agreed there was good cause for a protective order because "the People demonstrate that Defendant has an extensive history of publicly and repeatedly attacking trial jurors and grand jurors."

The former president has denied all wrongdoing in the case.

Up Next in News—

27-year-old man credited for saving kids, driver in runaway school bus

October 22, 2026

Elizabeth Holmes documentary: What to know, how to watch

October 15, 2026

Crew begins search for Amelia Earhart on remote island

October 14, 2026

What to know about new Apple HomeView smart home display hub

October 14, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Your Privacy Choices— 
  • Contact Us— 
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts— 

© 2026 ABC News