• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Rahm Emanuel Can Run for Chicago Mayor, Illinois Supreme Court Rules

ByCHRIS BURY and DEVIN DWYER
January 27, 2011, 11:45 PM

Jan. 27, 2011— -- The Illinois Supreme Court has cleared the way for former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel to run in Chicago's mayoral election on February 22.

In a 7-0 ruling, the Illinois high court struck down Monday's Appeals Court ruling that Emanuel failed to meet residency requirements, which require mayoral candidates to live in Chicago for at least one year before the election.

Today's ruling ensures that Emanuel's name will be on the ballot when early voting begins next Monday.

Even before issuing today's decision, the Illinois Supreme Court had already granted an emergency request by Emanuel to stop the city board of elections from printing ballots without his name on them.

The Board had been poised to begin printing the ballots in the next few days. The order made it clear that any ballots printed while Emanuel's appeal to the Supreme Court is pending must include his name.

"I have no doubt that, in the end, that we will prevail in this effort," Emanuel, the frontrunner in the race, said when his campaign filed its appeal.

The appellate court's surprise 2-to-1 decision on Monday had reversed earlier rulings by a Cook County judge and the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners that approved the legality of Emanuel's mayoral bid. Emanuel is a longtime Chicagoan, representing part of the city as a Congressman, but was away when he was President Obama's Chief of Staff.

The appeals court ruling distilled the debate over Emanuel's residency into two questions: whether Emanuel had "resided in the municipality" for at least one year as mandated by city code, and if not, whether he qualified for an exemption.

On the first issue, Judge Thomas Hoffman ruled that Emanuel did not fulfill residency requirements as intended by law.

"Reside generally means, among other things, 'to dwell permanently or continuously,' or to 'have a settled abode for a time,'" wrote Hoffman in the majority opinion. "We believe ... that the phrase 'resided in' as used in the Municipal Code requires actual, not constructive, residence."

Municipal code provides an exemption to the residency requirement for an "elector or spouse" who has left the precinct or district on "business of the United States or of this state."

But Hoffman ruled that that provision only applied to voters, not candidates for public office. "We agree ... that this exception applies to him," he wrote. "We disagree, however, with his position that the exception saves his candidacy. In our view, the exception ... applies only to voter residency requirements, not to candidate residency requirements."

From January 2009 through October 2010, Emanuel physically resided in Washington, D.C., where he worked daily at the White House.

Up Next in News—

Microsoft joins Apple in raising prices as fans await new 'Grand Theft Auto' game

June 25, 2026

Prosecutors drop rape charge against Harvey Weinstein, avoiding 4th trial

June 25, 2026

New York Knicks fan no longer employed by former company, fined after taking Knicks-themed trash can

June 24, 2026

What to know about housing legislative package passed by Congress

June 24, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News