• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • Wellness

Georgia's 6-week abortion ban officially struck down

4:40
Supreme Court strikes down restrictive abortion law in Louisiana
Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images, FILE
ByIvan Pereira
July 13, 2020, 9:10 PM

A judge struck down Georgia's controversial ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

District Judge Steve C. Jones said the state law, H.B. 481, was unconstitutional as it violated several stipulations set forth by Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that codified abortion as a protected right.

"After considering H.B. 481 as a whole, the title, the caption, the prior legislation, the legislative scheme, the old law, the evil, and the remedy, the Court rejects the State Defendants' argument that the statutory purpose solely concerns "promoting fetal well-being," he wrote in his decision.

Related Articles

MORE: Supreme Court hands down major decision reaffirming abortion rights in Louisiana case

The law was supposed to go into effect at the beginning of the year but was blocked while the courts heard the suit filed by several groups. Under the legislation, abortions would be banned after six weeks, which is approximately when a doctor may be able to detect a heartbeat from a fetus.

The law had exceptions for rape and incest; however, the patient would have to get a police report in that circumstance.

Demonstrators hold signs while marching during a protest against Georgia's "heartbeat" abortion bill in Atlanta, May 25, 2019.
Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images, FILE

Abortion rights activists who sued the state, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Rights, contended the law was made to undermine Roe v. Wade and restrict the right to choose.

"The district court blocked Georgia's abortion ban, because it violates over 50 years of Supreme Court precedent and fails to trust women to make their own personal decisions. This case has always been about one thing: letting her decide," Sean J. Young, the legal director, ACLU of Georgia said in a statement.

Related Articles

MORE: Georgia's 6-week abortion ban challenged by reproductive rights groups

The law, which passed with a 92 to 78 vote last year, generated an outcry from business leaders, including Hollywood heavyweights, who threatened to leave the state over the measure.

A spokesperson for Gov. Brian Kemp told ABC News in a statement his office will appeal the ruling.

"Georgia values life, and we will keep fighting for the rights of the unborn," spokesperson Candice Boce said in a statement.

Abortion rights advocates rally in front of the Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta to protest new restrictions on abortions that have been passed in Georgia, May 21, 2019.
Tami Chappell/AFP via Getty Images, FILE

The decision on the Georgia ban came two weeks after the U. S. Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required abortion providers have admitting privileges with a nearby hospital. The judges ruled in their decision that third-party standing, which means that a third party -- like an abortion provider -- is allowed to argue on behalf of the person impacted, applied in the Louisiana case.

Jones, the judge in the Georgia case, said when the case was heard in June that he would wait for the Supreme Court to decide on the third-party standing issue before he made a decision about the Georgia law.

Related Articles

MORE: Tennessee passes 6-week abortion ban during last-second budget negotiation

Abortion rights activists also scored a legal victory in Tennessee Monday after a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on a law passed the same day that also banned abortions after six weeks. The Tennessee law also blocked patients from having an abortion based on rape or incest.

"It is unconscionable that — in the middle of a public health crisis and a national reckoning on systemic racism — lawmakers are focused on trying to eliminate access to abortion," Jessica Sklarsky, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement.

Up Next in Wellness—

Online platform agrees to stop selling GLP-1 drugs to US customers

May 6, 2026

Parents of baby boy who was 'born twice' speak out

May 4, 2026

Doctor explains why too much animal protein could be harmful

May 1, 2026

Cancer survivor meets donor who saved her life during Disney World 5K

May 1, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2026 ABC News