• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Put Comparative Info on Drug Labels, Researchers Say

ByTODD NEALEMedPage Today
August 14, 2009, 7:10 PM

Aug. 16, 2009— -- If a new prescription drug has not been proven more effective than similar medications, the label should make that clear, a group of researchers asserted in the New England Journal of Medicine this past week.

This comparative effectiveness data is just as important as information regarding the risks and benefits of a drug or device, according to Dr. Randall Stafford of Stanford University and colleagues.

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirement for label information would allow patients, physicians, and insurers to better judge whether a drug is simply a "me-too" product or a real advance, they wrote in an online perspective article.

New technologies, including drugs and devices, are a major factor in the rise of health care expenditures, which have grown by an estimated 71 percent since 2000, they said.

"The problem is that the public, including physicians, often view FDA approval as constituting more than it does," Stafford said. "There's an inherent tendency for physicians and patients to want the newest thing and to assume that newer and more expensive means better, although this is often not the case."

In addition to battling cost increases, a mandate for more detailed labeling would spur comparative effectiveness studies by the manufacturers, they said.

Currently, manufacturers are hesitant to conduct these studies because they require larger sample sizes, are more expensive, and increase the risk of producing unfavorable findings, the researchers said.

"Drug and device manufacturers benefit from an unacknowledged information gap that develops as more and more products are tested against placebo, but not each other," Stafford said.

The researchers argued that "placebo-controlled trials that are not supplemented by active-comparator trials leave clinicians, patients, and payers in the dark, providing no guidance on a new product's advantages or disadvantages relative to existing products."

Using the example of a hypothetical new calcium channel blocker, they said a statement on the updated labeling might read: "Although this drug has been shown to lower blood pressure more effectively than placebo, it has not been shown to be more effective than other members of the same drug class."

Up Next in News—

Psychiatrists testify that Lindsay Clancy did not show signs of psychosis

August 7, 2026

Man charged with attempted murder in alleged lobster diving incident speaks out

August 7, 2026

Cambridge professor resigns amid plagiarism allegations, questions about 'academic qualifications'

August 6, 2026

Lindsay Clancy's friend says she was having 'dark thoughts' prior to killing her children

August 6, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts— 

© 2026 ABC News