The Supreme Court notably does not allow cameras inside its courtroom during arguments, meaning that sketch artists provide the only visual representation of some of the country's most defining legal moments.

Here are three sketches from the Trump arguments on Thursday -- of the justices and the attorneys for each side.

Trump reacted to the arguments before the justices later on Thursday afternoon after he left court for the day amid his hush money trial in New York, to which he has pleaded not guilty.

“I think it was made clear, I hope it was made clear, that a president has to have immunity," he said, repeating a familiar talking point. "You don't have a president -- or at most you could say it would be a ceremonial president. That's not what the founders had in mind.”

He continued, ”We want presidents that can get things done and bring people together. So I heard the meeting was quite amazing. Quite amazing. The justices were on their game.”

Trump did not answer shouted questions from the press.

-ABC News' Kelsey Walsh, Mike Pappano and Jianna Cousin

As various justices themselves acknowledged, they could potentially reshape the contours of presidential power when they rule on Trump's case.

Click here to read five takeaways from the historic arguments.

The oral arguments, stretching nearly three hours and with demonstrators gathered outside, included several notable and important exchanges.

Here are 10 of the key moments -- including discussion of potential self-pardons, Franklin D. Roosevelt and more.

Read more here.

How fast the justices move in making a determination will impact whether Trump stands trial before the November election -- if at all.

Experts point to how the court handled Bush v. Gore, when the justices intervened to end a ballot recount and effectively hand George W. Bush the presidency in the 2000 election. In United States v. Nixon, the Watergate scandal tapes case, the Supreme Court heard arguments July 8, 1974, and issued its opinion rejecting his claim of executive privilege 16 days later.

It’s not clear whether the court will move with such speed. The opinions are expected to be released before the court’s term ends in June.

The justices could uphold the lower court decision rejecting immunity in its entirety, clearing the way for a trial this summer. Or they could kick the can down the road by sending the case back to lower courts for further proceedings -- which some conservative justices floated during arguments. Such an outcome could rule out a trial before the end of the year.

Read more about timing in the case here.