Court was just adjourned for the week without addressing the "sensitive matter" discussed in a closed courtroom.

The judge also said nothing further about juror #6.

The parties spent the last hour discussing evidence outside the presence of the jury.

Federal prosecutors said they expect to rest no later than Friday of next week and as soon as Wednesday.

The next two witnesses are summary witnesses, followed by Combs' former assistant, Brendan Paul, and another summary witness. The last witness for the prosecution will be a law enforcement agent

The defense said it would take the weekend to think about the substance and duration of its case.

At the conclusion of court on Friday, Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed juror #6 over "inconsistencies" in statements he made about where he lived, and he said they raised questions of candor and ability to follow instructions.

In an "offhand" remark to court staff, the juror mentioned he had moved in with his girlfriend in New Jersey and had been living there most of the time.

When questioned by the court, "the juror said actually he was spending four to five nights in his New York apartment," Subramanian said. In follow up questions, the juror said he moved to where his daughter lives, with his girlfriend in New Jersey.

During jury selection, "this juror had answered, in response to the simple and straightforward questions, ‘Where do you live and who do you live with,’ Bronx, with his fiancé and daughter," Subramanian said.

The judge said it raised concerns about the juror’s basic qualifications, the juror’s candor and whether he made a deliberate attempt to get himself onto the jury.

"The changing answers and inconsistency give the court worry about deception and lying, which further implicate the veracity of other answers, including to questions that go to the heart of the case," Subramanian said. "Removal of the juror is required in this court’s view."

Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson lamented the dismissal of a Black juror because he said there are not enough Black and Hispanic individuals serving on juries.

Three separate defense attorneys stood to object to the juror’s removal for different reasons.

"It is going to be a less diverse jury. That is a fact," Donaldson said. "I don’t generally play the race card. I’m not saying I’m playing it now."

The dismissed juror would be replaced with an alternate.

"There are differences between principal jurors and alternate jurors," Marc Agnifilo said.

Subramanian promised to think about what the defense lawyers said and advise the parties if he changes his mind.

Subramanian called the attorneys to the bench and then announced the court had a "sensitive matter" to discuss.

He ordered the courtroom closed to all but the parties.

He did not say what the sensitive matter is.

On re-direct examination, Sean Combs’ former personal assistant Jonathan Perez testified that personal errands were part of his job.

"Who told you to set up king nights?" prosecutor Madison Smyser asked. "KK," Perez testified, referring to Combs’ chief of staff, Kristina Khorram.

"Did you set up those king nights for free?" Smyser asked. "No," Perez told the jury.

"Ever set up king nights on vacation?" Smyser followed up. "No," Perez told the jury.

Perez testified that part of his job involved doing personal things for Combs like writing cards to his girlfriends and buying them flowers.

Perez has concluded his testimony, thus concluding five weeks of testimony.

The judge dismissed jurors for the weekend with customary instructions not to talk to anyone about the case and turn off news notifications.

On cross-examination, Sean Combs’ former personal assistant Jonathan Perez testified that setting up hotel rooms and procuring drugs were personal errands and not work-related tasks.

"It had nothing to do with your work?" defense attorney Brian Steel asked. "No," Perez responded on the stand. Combs is accused of conspiring with his employees as part of a criminal enterprise.

Perez told the jury under cross-examination that he performed those tasks 1% of the time compared with his business-related duties.

"You just did it because you’re a nice person?" Steel asked. "Yes," Perez testified.

Perez testified that he helped "Jane" -- a former Combs girlfriend who took the stand under a pseudonym -- with outfits for hotel nights because she trusted his fashion sense.

"She would ask you to go out and go shopping for her?" Steel asked. "Yes," Perez told the jury.

"Would you look for her for lingerie?" "Yes," Perez testified on the stand.

"Would you look for her for dresses?" "Yes," Perez told the jury.

"The goal for her was to look good for Mr. Combs?" "Yes," Perez replied on the stand.

"Did you ever get the feeling that she was hesitant of joining the king nights?" Steel asked, using Perez’s term for "hotel nights" or "freak offs." "No," Perez testified.

Steel followed up, asking, "Did it always appear to you that she was willing?" "Yes," Perez told the jury.

Steel tried to emphasize Perez's testimony, asking, "Did ‘Jane’ ever appear to you, from your observation, that she was upset or unhappy after the king nights?" "No," Perez testified.

Sean "Diddy" Combs’ ex-girlfriend, appearing under the pseudonym “Jane,” returns to the witness stand for more cross-examination when court resumes this afternoon.

The defense had been attempting to cast "Jane" as a willing partner in Combs' lifestyle, which included multiple-partner sexual encounters known as "hotel nights." "Jane" has maintained that she was coerced into participating.

"Jane" told the jury on direct examination that her three-year relationship with Combs made her feel “manipulated,” “used,” and “resentful.” On cross-examination, "Jane" testified, “I loved spending time with my partner.”

She told the jury how she like to bathe Combs and give him foot rubs. “He was my baby,” "Jane" testified. “I’m naturally nurturing.”

After "Jane" told federal prosecutors on direct examination that Combs subjected her to so much sex with male prostitutes that it took over her life, defense attorney Teny Geragos sought to highlight the benefits of her relationship with Combs, including a $20,000 investment in her line of swimwear and dresses, paying the $10,000 monthly rent on her 5,300-square-foot home, and giving her gifts, including a Van Cleef necklace and a luxury handbag.

“What is a Bottega bag?” Geragos asked Tuesday.

“I'm sure you have one,” "Jane" retorted from the witness stand.

“I actually don't,” Geragos shot back. “How much do Bottega bags run?”

“How much does my body cost?” "Jane" testified in reply.

Judge Arun Subramanian then reminded her to answer the question.

When Geragos asked whether Combs had given her a Chanel bag, "Jane" told the court, “No, I only got trauma.”

But the defense appeared skeptical of "Jane’s" claims that she was traumatized by “hotel nights.”

Geragos showed the jury an effusive text message "Jane" wrote about a night with a male prostitute that she previously testified left her in tears. “I love you so, so, so, so much,” the message said. “I feel closer to you on another level.”

The defense also showed more explicit messages that showed "Jane" initiating plans to “get slutty” or boasting about sex with a favorite escort named Paul. "Jane" said Combs called them the “trifecta” and that they compared themselves to basketball stars: "Jane" was Kobe Bryant, Paul was Shaquille O’Neal and Combs was Michael Jordan.

Defense cross-examination of "Jane" is expected to continue through Thursday.