President Donald Trump spoke with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Friday about trade, Ukraine-Russia peace talks, and the Middle East, according to the White House.

The conversation follows the president meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni amid trade negotiations with countries in Europe.

The White House added that the president "looks forward" to a state visit with King Charles III later this year.

-ABC News' Fritz Farrow

Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, says there are now more than 15 trade deals on the table and that they include "big steps forward" in terms of what the countries are willing to do.

But Hassett repeatedly declined to clarify where talks with China stand and whether President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump have actually spoken. On Thursday, Trump said American and Chinese teams are in discussion for a deal on tariffs.

"Have President Trump and President Xi Jinping spoken?" ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Selina Wang asked Hassett.

"I don't have anything to add on that right now," Hassett said.

Wang also asked if China had reached out, to which Hassett reiterated he didn't have "anything to add."

President Donald Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni released a joint statement on Friday morning following their meeting on Thursday in Washington. In the statement, the two leaders "confirmed their resolve to promote a mutually beneficial relationship and further strengthen the U.S.-Italy strategic alliance across security, economic, and technological issues."

They also said Trump accepted Meloni's invitation for a visit to Italy "in the very near future" and possibly to hold a meeting then between U.S. and European leaders.

United States businesses, importers, retailers and farmers are breathing a sigh of relief as President Donald Trump's administration announced a phased-in implementation of port fees on "Chinese" vessels, starting with $0 for the first 180 days, rather than the previously announced $1 million to $1.5 million per port of call.

The fees, which initially had the potential to be cumulative, or more than $3 million for the affected ships for vessels that are made in China — or operated or owned by a company with any Chinese vessels in its fleet or on order — had drawn unprecedented outcry from the people and companies whom it would affect, since they are already facing increased costs because of tariffs.

Had the fees been issued starting Thursday, as was initially expected, experts predicted that most ships would skip smaller ports for larger ones, creating supply chain and labor issues.

“Currently, ships visit an average of three to four U.S. ports, both large and small, to move American cargo,” Nate Herman, senior vice president of policy for American Apparel & Footwear Association testified before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in March. "The United States has more than 300 ports — but only 10 major ports."

"If the proposed fees are implemented in every port call, shippers will likely reduce their port visits to just one U.S. port to minimize costs. As a result, calls to secondary ports would largely cease. These secondary ports would face a significant decline in business, leading to potential closures and significant job losses for American longshoremen," Herman told the USTR.

-ABC News' Soo Youn

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the U.S. is “moving quickly with many of our most important trading partners” and has meetings in coming days with Japan and South Korea.

“So, we had Vietnam in last week. We have Japanese in on Wednesday, South Korea next week. So, it's going to move fast, and we but the important thing for your viewers to know is we're setting up a process, and we are going to run the process,” Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg TV in Argentina.

It's going to be orderly, and at the end of the day, especially for the most important trade partners, the president is going,” Bessent said.

Pressed on how many countries he expected the U.S. to strike a deal with before the 90-day pause is up, Bessent painted an optimistic, but vague picture.

“ I think there could be numerous countries, and it may not be the actual trade document, but we will have agreement in principle and be able to move forward from there,” Bessent said.

Pressed again for a general sense of how many countries they expected to get a deal with, Bessent again was vague.

“I think it's going to depend, but we're going to move with all deliberate speed. And again, it's going to be a process. It's going to be USTR, who just has mountains of data that they've been collecting over the years. Because, in a funny way, the tariffs are the easiest part. So a country with high tariffs, you can just say, ‘OK, this, this, this, this, get rid of it. It's the non-tariff trade barriers that are more insidious, more difficult to spot, and it's probably going to take a little longer,” he said.

Asked if he would be able to provide clarity once the 90 days are up, Bessent replied, “I think clarity is through the eye of the beholder, but I can guarantee you that we're going to run a robust process, and I think the market can take great comfort in that,” Bessent said.

-ABC News’ Molly Nagle and Hannah Demissie