'They could have held out': Democratic voters support party after shutdown ends
As the federal government reopens after the House passed a short-term funding bill Wednesday, Democratic voters across the country reckon with their party's handling of the standoff -- and the fact that in the end, Democrats were not able to extend the Affordable Care Act subsidies they shut the government down over in the first place.
Carl Davidson, a 64-year-old salesman from Oakland, California, told ABC News in an interview that he will be "greatly affected" by the expiring subsidies.
"My California coverage is potentially going to go from $580 to $1,240," Davidson said.
Meanwhile Teresa White, a 67-year-old administrative assistant who is also from California, told ABC News she is most concerned about her son, whose "premiums are going to double."
"These are young men in their 30s. They are not high-risk … a lot of their friends are just going to forego insurance, and that's wrong," White said.
White and Davidson, as well as the rest of the voters named in this article, participated in an ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll and were called back to be interviewed about their views.
Even those not directly affected by the expected jumps in health care premiums believe it is a worthy cause. Jeffrey Martin, a 54-year-old electrician from Berkeley, Massachusetts, told ABC News he was "100%" supportive of congressional Democrats' fight for ACA subsidies.
"I think they could have held out, because I think that they were in the right. I think they were fighting for something important," Martin said.
Like Martin, 58-year-old Kevin Wolfe of Parkville, Maryland, wished congressional Democrats had "held out" for longer over the subsidies. Wolfe told ABC News in an interview that he is "kind of upset that they voted to end" the shutdown, even going so far as to say that he thinks Democrats "need to shut it down again."
"I don't know if we'd have gotten anything, but I think they could've held out a little longer to see," Wolfe said.
The government shutdown -- which lasted 43 days in total, making it the longest shutdown in U.S. history -- is funded only until Jan. 30, leaving open the possibility for the government to be shut down again if Congress can't come to an agreement over health care spending by the end of January.
Like Wolfe, White also said that the Democrats should shut the government down again when the short-term funding bill ends, even if it disrupts things like air travel.
"People don't have to travel, but you have to eat. And if you have a medical emergency, then you have to have care," White said.
But while voters like White, Martin and Wolfe wished Democrats had fought for longer, many said they believe that Democrats were successful in bringing national attention to the fight over health care taking place in Washington.
"I don't think it accomplished what its overall goal was, but I do believe it brought more attention to what is going to happen," Wolfe said.
"I don't think people realized at all what is going to happen with premiums," he added.
Davidson added that shutting down the federal government "concentrated the minds of many people who aren't following politics day-to-day."
The one thing many Democratic voters were in agreement on: Republicans are to blame for the shutdown. And with the 2026 midterm elections fast approaching, many speculate that the government shutdown will prove to be a stain on Republicans running for reelection.
"People do have a memory when it hits their wallets, so it could have some ramifications for Republicans in the midterms," Davidson said.
"I figure that the Republicans, who had the House, the Senate and the presidency, and also the Supreme Court -- they are responsible for the shutdown," said 71-year-old Curtis McLeod of Greensboro, North Carolina.
"I hope all the Republicans that held out lose their seat in the next election. That's all I'm thinking about," McLeod added.
But there were some Democratic voters who had more ambiguous feelings about the fight over ACA subsidies, especially those who were affected by federal cuts to SNAP that took place during the shutdown.
Dora C., a 59-year-old in southern Texas, told ABC News in an interview that the government "should have never been shut down from the beginning."
"I'm a grandmother raising three of my grandkids, and I am -- and still to this day -- I am on SNAP benefits … When they took that away for a short period of time, it did affect me -- of course it did -- because I'm not feeding only myself, I'm feeding three kids," Dora said.
"Yeah, I got these SNAP benefits put back in my card, but not all of them," Dora added.
Others called the government shutdown a "lose-lose situation."
"I think the Democrats always look kind of weak because the Republicans kind of do whatever they want and get away with it … I think [Democrats were] trying to fight back. And then the one time they fight back, it blows up like this," said Brittany D., a 29-year-old small business owner from the suburbs of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Vicki, a 57-year-old Democrat from Pennsylvania who declined to provide her last name, told ABC News in an interview that ultimately, the decision congressional Democrats faced to end the shutdown was "a Solomon's Choice."
"Do you choose the people that need food, or do you choose people that need health care? I would've had a hard decision choosing what to do," she said.
