The Impact of Turkey's Takedown of a Syrian Fighter Jet
March 30, 2014— -- Last Sunday, the Turkish army shot down a Syrian government fighter jet that it said had strayed across the border despite numerous warnings. "Our F-16s went up in the air and shot that plane down. Why? Because if you violate my air space, then from now on, our slap will be hard," Erdogan said later, at a campaign rally held in advance of next week's local elections.
Syrian state media said its planes had been pursuing rebel targets near the border.
Though analysts have called it an escalation, it's not the first time Turkey's military has been drawn into the conflict next door. Syria shot down a Turkish plane in 2012, and that autumn, Turkey opened fire on Syrian government positions after a Turkish border town was shelled, killing five civilians.
We asked Didem Aykel Collinsworth, Turkey analyst at the International Crisis Group, and Soli Özel, a political scientist and professor at Istanbul's Bilgi University, to weigh in on the impact of this week's events.
Didem Aykel Collinsworth: Specific to the escalation between Turkey and the Syrian government, these are isolated incidents and don't yet represent a tipping point where we're switching into a sustained direct confrontation between Turkey and Syria. Both sides still want to avoid an all-out war. But it's still an escalation and a reminder of the spillover from Syria.
Seventy-nine Turks have died in spillover clashes or car bombs or from stray shells, so it's a deadly conflict for Turkey, and we get these reminders of it from time to time. It's not an indication that the military engagement is going to get deeper.Flags fly in Istanbul Sunday near the site of a pre-election rally for Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Flags fly in Istanbul Sunday near the site of a pre-election rally for Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Turks fear he will use an escalation in Syria as a distraction from his domestic woes. / Karen Leigh for Syria Deeply
Soli Özel: We don't know what exactly happened, and we don't know if there were similar incidents like this that have happened where nothing was done. [If] there were warnings, then it's within the rules of engagement. I'm not sure if it's an escalation rather than a marker, where they say, "When and where we can, we will not tolerate your infringement on our borders."
SD: What can we make of Erdogan's rhetoric in the lead-up to local elections?
Collinsworth: Domestically, military intervention in Syria is very unpopular. Only slightly more than five percent support it. That said, we see that the Turkish government, and particularly the prime minister [Erdogan] are using this for domestic consumption. Turkey had toned down this war rhetoric over the past year, but now with this incident we have seen a re-escalation of the rhetoric, and this is mostly for domestic [benefit], particularly as we approach elections.
This is dangerous and could be misinterpreted domestically. It needs to be toned back down and shouldn't be seen as an increase in aggression by the international community, because that could hurt Turkey's position in the region and the role it plays in the conflict.
There is definitely a concern among the Turkish people that this could be used as a diversion away from domestic troubles and scandals and so on. At the same time there's very little Turkish appetite for involvement in Syria.
SD: What happens next between the two countries?
