• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Contact Us
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • © 2026 ABC News
  • News

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow immediate firing of 29 transgender military service members

3:44
The impact of banning transgender military service members
STOCK PHOTO/Getty Images
Devin Dwyer, Senior Washington Reporter, ABC News.
ByDevin Dwyer
August 31, 2026, 6:57 PM

Calling it a matter of "exceptional importance," the Trump administration has filed an urgent appeal with the Supreme Court seeking the immediate removal of 29 active-duty service members who are transgender even before their case challenging the Pentagon ban goes to trial in January. 

Several courts have found that the ban was likely rooted in animus and violates servicemembers constitutional rights to due process and equal protection – a conclusion the government strongly disputes.   

While the justices last year gave Trump the green light to move forward broadly with a ban on service members who have a history of gender dysphoria, federal judges in a separate case, U.S. v. Talbott, last June blocked the military from discharging more than two dozen individual plaintiffs who brought the lawsuit challenging the policy. 

The United States Supreme Court in Washington D.C.
STOCK PHOTO/Getty Images

Solicitor General John Sauer called the ruling allowing those plaintiffs to remain in their positions "gravely erroneous."

Related Articles

Supreme Court allows Trump to implement transgender military service ban for now

"The authority of the U.S. military to determine who may serve in the Nation’s armed forces is a matter of exceptional importance," Sauer wrote in the government's petition. "Whether the Constitution prohibits the military from exercising that authority by adopting a policy like the one here is a recurring issue, which has arisen before and will likely arise again absent this Court’s review. The Court should thus take this opportunity to address the constitutionality of the [Department of Defense Secretary] Hegseth policy and reverse the decision below, whose reasoning cannot be squared with this Court’s precedents or deference to the military."

The justices will consider this fall whether to hear the case at this early stage, before any final ruling on the merits by a lower court.

In the meantime, the 29 plaintiffs – who are active-duty, reservists, National Guard members and a person seeking to enlist – will remain in the force. 

"As the Trump administration’s own attorneys admitted, these are qualified individuals who are meeting all military standards," said Jennifer Levi, an attorney representing the transgender service members with the LGBTQ legal advocacy group GLAD Law. "There is no reason to waste millions of taxpayer dollars to kick out thousands of highly trained, skilled and decorated troops based on nothing but hostility and this administration’s political whims."

Up Next in News—

What to know about the new Elizabeth Holmes documentary from Nathan Fielder

September 7, 2026

Lindsay Clancy trial puts spotlight on defense attorney, prosecutors

September 5, 2026

Lindsay Clancy supporters vow to return in 'bigger numbers' after mistrial

September 4, 2026

Lindsay Clancy trial declared a mistrial. What happens next?

September 4, 2026

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts

© 2026 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Your Privacy Choices— 
  • Contact Us— 
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts— 

© 2026 ABC News