• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • GMA3: WYNTK
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2025 ABC News
  • Culture

Prince Harry wins 'significant damages' in lawsuit against UK tabloid

20:35
Ben Brichall/AFP/Getty Images
Full interview: Author tells Harry and Meghan’s side of the story in his new book
Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images, FILE
ByZoe Magee and Katie Kindelan
February 01, 2021, 6:11 PM

Prince Harry has ended his libel case against a U.K. tabloid that quoted a top British general as saying Harry was not taking his military responsibilities seriously.

Harry, the Duke of Sussex, won "significant damages" in the case against Associated Newspapers Ltd., publisher of the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline, according to his spokesperson.

The legal dispute stemmed from an article that ran in October in the Mail on Sunday with the headline, "Top general accuses Harry of turning his back on the Marines." MailOnline also published a nearly identical article with the headline, “Top general accuses Prince Harry of turning his back on the Royal Marines after stepping down from ceremonial role as part of Megxit deal.”

The Duke of Sussex, who served 10 years in the British Army, lost his military titles and patronages -- including Captain General Royal Marines, Honorary Air Commandant Royal Air Force Honington, Small Ships and Diving, Royal Naval Command: Commodore in Chief -- when he and his wife Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, stepped down last year from their roles as senior, working members of Britain's royal family.

In this file photo taken on January 16, 2020, Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex watches children play rugby league prior to the draw for the Rugby League World Cup 2021 at Buckingham Palace in London.
Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images, FILE

In December, two months after the articles were published, the Mail on Sunday offered to settle the dispute, pay substantial damages and not repeat the allegations. The newspaper also ran a correction and issued an apology to Prince Harry.

"We now understand that Harry has been in contact in a private capacity with individuals in the military including in the Royal Marines to offer informal support since March and that whilst he did not initially receive the letter from Lord Dannatt referred to in the article due to administrative issues he has since replied on becoming aware of it," the statement read. "We apologize to Prince Harry and have made a donation to the Invictus Games Foundation."

Harry founded the Invictus Games in 2014 as a Paralympic-style competition for wounded service members. He continues to lead the organization in his role as a non-working member of the royal family.

Editor’s Picks

Meghan wins final copyright claim in tabloid lawsuit over letter to her estranged dad

  • May 05, 2021

Prince Harry describes his 'awakening' to racial inequality since meeting Meghan

  • Oct 01, 2020

What's next for Harry, Meghan 1 year after announcing decision to exit royal family

  • Jan 08, 2021

As part of the settlement with Associated Newspapers, a lawyer for Prince Harry was allowed to make a statement Monday in the Royal Courts of Justice.

"The truth is that The Duke of Sussex has made repeated and concerted efforts to continue to support the Royal Marines and other members of the Armed Forces and their families over the past year, even though he was required to step back from his formal military roles in the ‘year of transition’ during which he must take a reduced role as a member of the Royal Family," Harry's lawyer, Jenny Afia, said in a prepared statement read in court. "It is also untrue that The Duke ignored correspondence from Lord Dannatt. This could have been explained to the Defendant had The Duke been given a fair opportunity to put forward his version of events prior to publication."

Afia also said in court that Harry is "personally is donating the damages from this case to the Invictus Games Foundation."

Related Articles

MORE: Prince Harry denies report he and Meghan are quitting social media for good

The amount of the settlement was not made public. Associated Newspapers did not make a statement during Monday's hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice.

The libel claim against Associated Newspapers is one of six lawsuits Harry and Meghan have launched since Harry made an impassioned statement against the tabloid press at the end of their 2019 tour in South Africa, in which he accused the British tabloid press of a waging “a ruthless campaign” against his wife.

Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, arrives with Prince Harry at the Royal Albert Hall in London, March 7, 2020, to attend the Mountbatten Festival of Music.
Pool-Simon Dawson/AP

Meghan is also suing Associated Newspapers after the Mail on Sunday and the Mail Online published parts of a handwritten letter she had sent to Thomas Markle in August 2018. The judge in that case recently agreed to Meghan's lawyers' request to postpone the trial, citing a “confidential” reason. If the case goes to trial, it is expected to start in October or November 2021.

Over the weekend, Meghan issued a very strong statement after tabloids reported that she had removed her first two names from the birth certificate of her and Harry's son, Archie. The family of three now live in California, having relocated there from the U.K. last year.

The Sun newspaper speculated in an article that Meghan had removed her names “as a snub to the Cambridges who have included Kate’s names on her children’s certificates. It may also be viewed as Harry aligning his wife with mum Di, who always used “Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales."

Related Articles

MORE: What's next for Prince Harry, Meghan 1 year after announcing decision to exit royal family

“The change of name on public documents in 2019 was dictated by The Palace, as confirmed by documents from senior Palace officials. This was not requested by Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex nor by The Duke of Sussex," a spokesperson for Meghan said in a statement. "To see this U.K. tabloid and their carnival of so-called ‘experts’ cho[o]se to deceptively whip this into a calculated family ‘snub’ and suggest that she would oddly want to be nameless on her child’s birth certificate, or any other legal document, would be laughable were it not offensive. There’s a lot going on in the world; let’s focus on that rather than creating clickbait.”

Related Topics

  • Royal Family
  • Harry and Meghan

Editor’s Picks

Meghan wins final copyright claim in tabloid lawsuit over letter to her estranged dad

  • May 05, 2021

Prince Harry describes his 'awakening' to racial inequality since meeting Meghan

  • Oct 01, 2020

What's next for Harry, Meghan 1 year after announcing decision to exit royal family

  • Jan 08, 2021

Up Next in Culture—

Taylor Swift no longer facing subpoena in Justin Baldoni's legal feud with Blake Lively

May 23, 2025

Megan Fox says pregnancy was 'unplanned but a happy surprise'

May 22, 2025

Kieran Culkin joins 'The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping' cast as Caesar Flickerman

May 22, 2025

Kim Kardashian graduates from law study program after 6 years

May 22, 2025

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2025 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2025 ABC News